Evaluating Danida support to development research
For the past year, we have been working with an excellent team to evaluate the Danida support to development research over the period 2008-2018. The report has now been published and can be accessed here.
A total of around 2 billion DKK was granted to research projects assessed by the evaluation. The main aim was to provide insights that would help to shape future support for development research. Responding to 20 evaluation questions and guided by four evaluation criteria, the evaluation combined a mixed methods and systems-informed design. From a methodological perspective, an innovation was the use of Research Quality Plus (RQ+), which is a flexible and holistic approach for evaluating the quality of research for development. This approach embraces a broad definition of research quality that includes scientific rigor but also recognizes other critical dimensions, for instance gender equality. Read more about RQ+ here.
In brief, the evaluation finds that:
· The research supported by Danida was of high quality in terms of technical integrity, relevance and originality. Quality was lower in terms of the normative ‘research legitimacy’ dimension in RQ+, including gender-responsiveness, alertness to negative consequences, and engagement with local knowledge systems.
· The most visible, significant contribution of Danida’s financing has been the development of basic use-focused, applied research capacities at individual researcher level, but also through support to institutions.
· In terms of real impact on ‘development’, especially at scale, this has seldom been achieved, but research teams have done much that is valuable in a national context despite significant challenges and limited resources.
Based on these conclusions, the evaluation provides a number of options to stimulate discussion for the future of Danish development research, each with different areas of focus and resource requirements.
The team consisted of Zenda Ofir (Evaluation Team Leader, South Africa), Pernille Sørensen (Denmark), Matti Tedre (Finland), Adom Baisie Ghartey (Ghana), Godfrey Kayobyo (Uganda), Nguyen Ngoc Anh (Vietnam), supported internally with Samantha Smith, Camila Demmou as research assistants and Johanna Lindström as Project Manager. Viktoria Hildenwall quality assured the reports. The evaluation was overseen by an independent commission, and commissioned by the Evaluation, Learning and Quality Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs/Danida, Denmark.